a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2019 Dayton DUI.
All Rights Reserved.

9:00 - 17:00

Our Opening Hours Mon. - Fri.

Facebook

Twitter

Search
OVI Menu
 

DUI Case Argued Before U.S. Supreme Court (Bullcoming v. New Mexico)

Dayton DUI Attorney Charles Rowland > DUI Law  > DUI Case Argued Before U.S. Supreme Court (Bullcoming v. New Mexico)

DUI Case Argued Before U.S. Supreme Court (Bullcoming v. New Mexico)

The Supreme Court of the United States. Washin...

Image via Wikipedia

Is An Analyst Required To Appear In Court?

The United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Bullcoming v. State of New Mexic0 (Docket No. 09-10876) to decide “whether the Confrontation Clause permits the prosecution to introduce testimonial statements of a nontestifying forensic analyst through the in-court testimony of a supervisor or other person who did not perform or observe the laboratory analysis described in the statements.”  According the the National College for DUI Defense, Stanford Associate Law professor Jeffrey L. Fisher, who brought and won the Crawford and Melindez-Diaz cases is slated to handle oral arguments.  National College for DUI Defense Regent Lenny Stamm and NCDD members Ronald L. Moore and Justin J. McShane collaborated on an amicus brief in the Bullcoming case.  A decision is expected sometime in 2011.

Charles M. Rowland II is one of Ohio’s leading DUI attorneys, practicing in Dayton and throughout the Miami Valley.  Contact him at 937-318-1DUI, 1-888-ROWLAND or visit www.DaytonDUI.com.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Charles Rowland

charlie@daytondui.com

Charles M. Rowland II has been representing the accused drunk driver for over 20 years. Contact him at (937) 318-1384 if you find yourself facing a DUI (now called OVI) charge.

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.