a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2019 Dayton DUI.
All Rights Reserved.

9:00 - 17:00

Our Opening Hours Mon. - Fri.

Facebook

Twitter

Search
OVI Menu
 

DUI Defenses Should be Permitted

Dayton DUI Attorney Charles Rowland > Uncategorized  > DUI Defenses Should be Permitted

DUI Defenses Should be Permitted

Erosion of civil rights
Image by alancleaver_2000 via Flickr

The accused in a DUI case has the right under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to present witnesses and evidence in his favor.  The Supreme Court upheld these rights in Washington v. Texas (1967), 388 U.S. 14, 19, 87 S.Ct. 1920, stating, “the right to offer testimony of witnesses, if necessary, is in plain terms the right to present a defense.  Just as an accused has the right to confront the prosecution’s witnesses to challenge their testimony, he has the right to present his witnesses to establish a defense.  This right is a fundamental element of due process of law.”

Given the above, how can a Judge prevent an accused drunk driver from presenting evidence  based on the rising alcohol defense or the retrograde extrapolation defense?  This is a fertile area for Constitutional challenge.  Until addressed it is yet another example of how DUI is treated differently in the system.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Charles Rowland

charlie@daytondui.com

Charles M. Rowland II has been representing the accused drunk driver for over 20 years. Contact him at (937) 318-1384 if you find yourself facing a DUI (now called OVI) charge.

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.