a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2019 Dayton DUI.
All Rights Reserved.

9:00 - 17:00

Our Opening Hours Mon. - Fri.

Facebook

Twitter

Search
OVI Menu
 

DUI Science and Blood Contamination

Dayton DUI Attorney Charles Rowland > DUI Law  > DUI Process  > DUI Science and Blood Contamination

DUI Science and Blood Contamination

Blood Sweat and Tears. Number 2

The practice of modern DUI law involves understanding the various scientific tests that have become commonplace in forensic collection and storage of specimens for alcohol analysis.  Specifically, DUI attorneys must understand that contamination can increase the concentration of ethanol in a specimen.  Typically, contamination takes one of two forms.  The first is straight-forward physical contamination which may manifest itself before, during or after collection.  The second form of contamination occurs when microorganisms contaminate a sample and produce ethanol in the sample thereby falsely inflating the amount of ethanol therein.  This article will focus on the physical contamination that may cause an ethanol gain.

“A recognized source of physical contamination is the use of alcohol containing swabs to disinfect the area of specimen collection in the living patient.  This method of specimen contamination is well documented in the literature (Heise, 1959; Taberner, 1989; Goldfinger and Schaber 1982).  Medical-Legal Aspects of Alchol, 4th ed., edited by James C. Garriott, pp237-248.  Most hospital protocols call for the use of an aqueous providone iodine solution that can avoid this form of physical contamination. Id. citing (Ryder and Glick, 1986).

In situations involving trauma, your attorney should investigate whether or not the specimen may have been contaminated via a transthoracic puncture of blind external chest stick.  This type of contamination can take place in cases of trauma or death.  The attorney should look for contamination via cardiac fluid or contamination by contact with stomach contents. Id. (Logan and Lindholm (1996) and Winek et al. (1995).  In postmortem situations, collection of a specimen can be physically contaminated if the introduction of volatile embalming fluids are present prior to the collection of the sample. Id. (Newbar and Myers, 1954).  Our office has made use of legal nurse consultants to identify potential sources of contamination due to emergency procedures.

Dayton DUI attorney Charles M. Rowland II is Ohio’s only Forensic Sobriety Assessment certified attorney and has attended the National College for DUI Defense’s Mastering Science Seminar on multiple occasions.  He has lectured on DUI science and has earned a reputation as an accomplished trial attorney.   Charles M. Rowland II dedicates his practice to defending the accused drunk driver in Fairborn, Springfield, Kettering, Vandalia, Xenia, Miamisburg, HuberHeights, Beavercreek, Centerville, Springboro, Franklin and throughout Ohio.  He has the credentials and the experience to win your case and has made himself the Miami Valley’s choice for DUI defense.  Contact Charles Rowland by phone at 937-318-1DUI (937-318-1384), 937-879-9542, or toll-free at 1-888-ROWLAND (888-769-5263).  For after-hours help contact our 24/7 DUI HOTLINE at 937-776-2671.  For information about Dayton DUI sent directly to your mobile device, text DaytonDUI (one word) to 50500.  Follow DaytonDUI on Twitter @DaytonDUI or Get Twitterupdates via SMS by texting DaytonDUI to 40404. DaytonDUI is also available on Facebook,www.facebook.com/daytondui and on the DaytonDUI channel on YouTube.  You can also email Charles Rowland at: CharlesRowland@DaytonDUI.com or write to us at 2190 Gateway Dr., Fairborn, Ohio 45324.

Charles Rowland

charlie@daytondui.com

Charles M. Rowland II has been representing the accused drunk driver for over 20 years. Contact him at (937) 318-1384 if you find yourself facing a DUI (now called OVI) charge.

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.