a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2017 Dayton DUI.
All Rights Reserved.

9:00 - 17:00

Our Opening Hours Mon. - Fri.

937.318.1384

Call 24/7 - Free Consultation!

Facebook

Twitter

Search
OVI Menu
 

Kettering OVI Defense: Top Strategies To Win Your Case

Dayton DUI Attorney Charles Rowland > Uncategorized  > Kettering OVI Defense: Top Strategies To Win Your Case

Kettering OVI Defense: Top Strategies To Win Your Case

KETTERING OVI DEFENSE

Kettering OVI defenseWhen people need an Kettering OVI defense attorney, the biggest challenge is knowing whether or not an attorney truly has the skills, knowledge, training, tools, resources, and strategies that are needed to successfully resolve and win drunk driving cases. Countless attorneys handle impaired driving cases. However,  only a small percentage have the skills that are needed to successfully resolve and win cases. Unfortunately for the public, even attorneys who have been practicing law for many years and devote a significant portion of their practice to OVI law, often don’t have the resources, and strategies that are needed to successfully resolve and win OVI cases. Make sure your attorney is  familiar with these “TOP 10” defenses to an Ohio OVI.

HIRE THE BEST KETTERING OVI DEFENSE ATTORNEY

The most important decision that you can make in defending your case is hiring the right Kettering OVI defense attorney.  OVI defense involves understanding Ohio’s complex impaired driving  laws. Your attorney should be familiar with the Ohio Administrative Code, the breath test device and field sobriety testing. It is vital that they stay current on all manners of science which may affect your case. Defense begins with an attorney who has the experience to fight your case. And, possesses the scientific knowledge to attack in the right places. In addition, your attorney should credibly negotiate with the prosecuting attorney to secure the best outcome.  We have written “How To Hire An Kettering OVI defense Attorney” to help you understand some issues you may not consider.

ILLEGAL POLICE STOP

If the officer lacked proper cause to initiate a traffic stop, your case may be dismissed.  The Fourth Amendment requires an officer have a reasonable suspicion that a crime is being committed or about to be committed before making a traffic stop. Reasonable suspicion may consist of any minor traffic offense. Examples include speeding, weaving, an accident, expired plates, or a failure to activate headlights.  Upon being stopped the officer must establish an articulable reason to continue your detention to do an alcohol/drunk driving investigation.

IMPROPER ADMINISTRATION OF STANDARDIZED FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS

If an officer improperly administers the field tests the results are compromised. The officer often gives faulty instructions or misunderstands how to administer the tests. We see officers hold the accused to impossible standards. Improperly administered tests amount to nothing more than “Stupid Human Tricks.”  Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST) were developed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration(NHTSA) to help determine the level of intoxication of a driver without chemical testing.

When an OVI suspect refuses a chemical test, the tests can be substantial evidence of intoxication.  The NHTSA has guidelines as to how the standardized field sobriety tests must be given. If the arresting officer fails to substantially comply with the guidelines established by the NHTSA, then the results of the tests are not admissible as evidence against the defendant. Your Kettering OVI defense attorney will be familiar with the standardized tests, the NHTSA manual and have experience cross-examining an arresting officer.

FAULTY INTERPRETATION OF THE STANDARDIZED FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS

The officer may say all of the right things to get a valid field sobriety test, and still improperly interpret what he or she is seeing.  Your Kettering OVI defense attorney will review any video of the stop to make sure that your fields tests were fairly administered and properly scored.  Arresting officers can (and do) misinterpret the performance of the SFST’s, and determine the performance to be a failure. The dashboard video and aggressive cross examination of the arresting officers will determine whether a OVI defendant actually failed the SFST’s, or if the officer made a mistake. If the defendant did not fail the SFST’s, the results will serve as evidence that the defendant was not intoxicated.

UNLAWFUL ARREST NOT SUPPORTED BY PROBABLE CAUSE

Assuming the officer has made a valid traffic stop, he or she must continue the investigation until probable cause exists for an OVI arrest.  Often, an officer intending to determine whether probable cause exists for an OVI arrest will make the arrest before this determination is made. When this happens, the officer has made an unlawful arrest, and all evidence obtained after the arrest may be deemed inadmissible in court.  Placing a suspect in a patrol car or ordering a suspect to follow directions before determining a suspect’s sobriety may constitute an unlawful arrest. If so, any evidence obtained regarding intoxication may be deemed inadmissible in court.

OFFICER ERROR PRIOR TO CHEMICAL TESTING

If any statements are made after the accused is in custody, they may excluded unless a proper Miranda warningwas given.  The officer must also satisfy a 20 minute observation period prior to administering an evidential breath test.  The breath test must be given within three hours of operation.  The officer must make sure that the testing conditions are free from radio frequency interference and that the testing location is not otherwise compromised.

Prior to requesting a suspect to submit to a chemical test, the arresting officer is required inform the driver of the consequences of submitting to the test, the driver’s right to refuse to submit to the test and the consequences for so refusing. If the driver submits to the test, he may be providing the State with evidence of intoxication. Failure of the arresting officer to advise the suspect of the above may render the results of the test, or the refusal inadmissible, and may fail to justify a license suspension.  Your Ohio OVI defense attorney should have a firm understanding of the Ohio Administrative Code and its requirements for a proper chemical test.

BAD BREATH: A FLAWED BREATH MACHINE

Above we discussed defenses that arise prior to the administration of the chemical test.  There are also potential defenses present in the administration of the test. You Ohio DUI defense attorney will be familiar with the Ohio Administrative Code requirements regarding calibration and officer performance.  You should ask your Ohio OVI defense attorney to show you the “guts” of the tests that are available at the Ohio Department of Health website.  What is more, you should only hire an attorney who has become certified on the breath test machine or attended sufficient specialized training so that he or she can spot any issues with the results.  Machines, despite what some may say, are far from perfect and often a keen eye will result in a “Not Guilty.”

DISCOVERY, DISCOVERY, DISCOVERY

Your Ohio OVI defense attorney cannot defend you against an issue he or she does not know exists.  An experienced Kettering OVI defense attorney will get proper discovery to explore every possible defense.  Filing motions for discovery, motions to preserve evidence and expeditiously obtaining the evidence is a good start.  In every DUI case, I submit a comprehensive discovery request for every type of evidence possible.   I contact the law enforcement agency directly to place it on notice to preserve evidence. This evidence includes dashboard videos and booking videos. These videos must be requested before they are destroyed. These videos can be indispensable in establishing exactly how a field test was administered. They show how a driver performed. Importantly, they can also establish whether a driver’s speech was slurred. Often, these videos contradict an officer’s allegations and exonerate the driver.

CREDIBILITY IS KING

The coin of the realm in all plea negotiations is the credibility, experience and knowledge.  Credibility comes from presenting your case in a way that makes the prosecutor understand your arguments.  Experience is knowing when and where to be persuasive.  Most prosecutors distain whiners, bullies and bullshit artists, so don’t do it.  I always strive to earn the respect of every prosecutor I come into contact with.  Knowledge about Ohio OVI defense comes from being dedicated to learning as much as you can.  We once had a slogan that said, “Is your attorney thinking of DUI defense right now? If not, call DaytonDUI.”  I have practiced DUI defense since 1995. Most of those years include practicing DUI defense exclusively.  I continue to try to establish myself as one of the best DUI attorneys in Ohio.

NOTING MATTERS IF YOU WON’T FIGHT

You can have the best defenses in the world, but they won’t matter unless you pursue them.  A good attorney will not only pursue the best possible plea, but will prepare for trial.  Your attorney should provide context and give you enough information to make a good decision.  Your attorney has an obligation to give you information and abide by your decision.  If you think you have a good chance of winning, make sure you hire the best attorney.  In our office we say “good things happen at trial.” My motto is, “All I do is OVI defense.”

Charles Rowland

charlie@daytondui.com

Charles M. Rowland II has been representing the accused drunk driver for over 20 years. Contact him at (937) 318-1384 if you find yourself facing a DUI (now called OVI) charge.

No Comments

Leave a Comment