a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2019 Dayton DUI.
All Rights Reserved.

9:00 - 17:00

Our Opening Hours Mon. - Fri.

Facebook

Twitter

Search
OVI Menu
 

Ohio Speeding Law Update: Laser Guns & Admissibility

Dayton DUI Attorney Charles Rowland > DUI Law  > Ohio Speeding Law Update: Laser Guns & Admissibility

Ohio Speeding Law Update: Laser Guns & Admissibility

A typical speed limit sign in the United State...

Great Speeding Decision from the 12th Appellate District

In State v. Starks, 2011-Ohio-2344 the Defendant was stopped for a speeding violation  in a construction zone and went to trial pro se. He objected to any testimony regarding a laser gun.  The trial court took judicial notice of the reliability of the laser gun and the defendant was convicted.  He appealed to the 12th District Court of Appeals and his conviction was reversed.  The Court ruled,

Although the underlying principles of laser technology may be the same from one device to another, generally judicial notice as to the reliability of a speed-measuring device is device specific. State v. Kincaid, 124 Ohio Misc.2d 92, 2003-Ohio-4632, ¶15.  Therefore, expert testimony is necessary, “whether it be a new device or an upgrade of an existing device, before the court may take judicial notice of that particular device in future
proceedings.” Id. at ¶20.

If you need an attorney to challenge your speeding case anywhere in the Miami Valley, or throughout Ohio,  contact Charles M. Rowland II at (937)318-1384 or 1-888-ROWLANDOhio traffic attorney Charles M. Rowland  is a former city prosecutor and has defended speeding cases for over fifteen year.  You can find the decision discussed above HERE.

Charles Rowland

charlie@daytondui.com

Charles M. Rowland II has been representing the accused drunk driver for over 20 years. Contact him at (937) 318-1384 if you find yourself facing a DUI (now called OVI) charge.

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.