a

Facebook

Twitter

Copyright 2019 Dayton DUI.
All Rights Reserved.

9:00 - 17:00

Our Opening Hours Mon. - Fri.

Facebook

Twitter

Search
OVI Menu
 

OVI Case Law Update; State v. Sani

Dayton DUI Attorney Charles Rowland > DUI Law  > OVI Case Law Update; State v. Sani

OVI Case Law Update; State v. Sani

Stylized arrest.

Image via Wikipedia

Twenty-Minute Observation Case (9th District Court of Appeals)

State v. Sani, 2010-Ohio-2813 (9th Dist. Ct. App.) http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/9/2010/2010-ohio-2813.pdf

In this case the Defendant is stopped for littering and is subsequently arrested for drunk driving.  The officer starts the observation period for purposes of the twenty-minute observation period as the time he begins the standardized field sobriety tests.  He placed the defendant under arrest and left the defendant in the car for four minutes while he attended to the vehicle and other matters.   Defendant challenged this as  a proper observation period and the trial court agreed.  What’s more…so did the Court of Appeals who ruled that this deviation was not de minimus and the actions of the officer did not substantially comply with the testing regulations.

This is a great case with great language for DUI defense attorneys.  Thanks to Jeff Meadows and www.OVILaw.com for the alert to this case.  If you are an attorney who takes DUI cases, Jeff’s site is must-have stuff.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Charles Rowland

charlie@daytondui.com

Charles M. Rowland II has been representing the accused drunk driver for over 20 years. Contact him at (937) 318-1384 if you find yourself facing a DUI (now called OVI) charge.

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.